February 22, 2014

Thor Polysonic Synthesizer Part 2: Filters



The next set of components I would like to talk about are Thor’s filters.  Each filter has a unique function that can be used to cut harmonic content and shape a sound (called subtractive synthesis).

So lets take a look at the filters:

Low Pass Ladder Filter

This filter is just a “simple” low pass filter.  I say “simple” because it only has a single function: filtering out high-frequency content.  On the filter you have the capability to set the filter frequency and resonance level.  There are also controls that alter how the filter is effected by the filter envelope, velocity, and keyboard position.  You can also invert these functions as well as increase the amplitude with a linear slider labeled “drive”.  In addition, there is a selector switch that alters the slope (2x 24dB/18dB/12dB/6dB per octave).

The final selection switch turns on the ability for this filter to self-oscillate.  A self-oscillating filter can create a sine wave when the resonant frequency is high enough to oscillate itself. 

State Variable Filter

The state variable filter is more of jack-of-all-trades filter.  In addition to the common modulator functions, frequency/resonance selectors and “drive”, the State Variable filter allows you to change its function between Low Pass filter, High Pass filter, Band Pass filter, Notch filter or Peak filter.  You can also alter how close to high-pass/low-pass the peak and notch filters act.

Comb Filter

The comb filter is an interesting component that is normally used to add a chorus/flange-like effect to a sound.  This effect is achieved by taking a clone of the incoming signal, and delaying it slightly before summing the two signals back together.  This causes phase summation and cancellation at different intervals (when used with a pure sine wave).  When using more complex wave forms, more interesting “resonant regeneration” occurs.  There is a +/- selector that allows you to invert the resonant peaks caused by the phase modulation creating a slightly different sound.

Formant Filter

The formant filter is similar to the “wha” guitar effect pedal in that it can emulate the consonant “w” along with different vowel sounds (based on the spectral content of  the input signal).  The formant filter in thor allows you to replicate different consonants and vowel sound (albeit on a limited scale – nowhere near the ca[abilities of the human voice) in addition to changing the “gender” of the signal (most likely by altering the amplitudes of the lower frequencies).  The filter itself is controlled by a virtual X/Y pad, which can be manipulated (and even modulated via Thor or automation) to sweep through multiple consonants and vowels.  So how is this achieved?  Formant filters act like multiple band-pass filters acting on the same signal at the same time. 


This is just a brief look at Thor’s filters.  For more in-depth information, visit Propelloheads’ series called Thor Demystified, or this article from Reason Experts.


Next week I will take a closer look at modulation sources and the modulation bus matrix.  Thanks for reading and I hope you get a chance to play around with Thor!  

Thor Polysonic Synthesizer Part 1: Oscillators


In my last post I discussed U-He’s Zebra – a virtual instrument plug-in.  This week I would like to discuss a great instrument that comes with Reason.

Thor is an incredible instrument with immense capabilities and a vast array of possible sounds which are created using up to three oscillators and a various selection of filters, shapers, modulation, chorus and delay.  At a glance, Thor can look intimidating, and even a veteran Thor user can find it daunting when trying to tweak parameters to get the right sound.  But as long as you understand the components available to you, Thor can become a great ally when trying to create simple or complex sounds.  My suggestion: experiment, turn knobs and push buttons; don’t be afraid to screw up… you might accidentally find a great sound!

Now, lets look under the hood at the oscillators:

Oscillators

Thor has three oscillator slots available for use, but this synthesizer offers a diverse selection of oscillator types to choose from.

Analogue oscillator

The analogue oscillator is an emulation of basic hardware wave synthesis.  You have sawtooth, square (with pulse width setting), triangle and sine waves.  With an initialized Thor patch and no filter, these oscillators sound simple and bland, but because there are three oscillators, you have the capability to layer sounds via either different waveforms, the same waveform at different octaves or the same waveforms on the same octave but detuned (think super-saw).  The oscillator controls (to the left of the oscillator slot) also allow you to perform amplitude modulation and sync functions.  Check out this tutorial from Propellorheads to explain this concept more in depth. 

Multi Oscillator

The multi oscillator acts just like it’s name suggests… This component offers multiple voices (up to 8) of each waveform, and allows you to detune them based on a selection of algorithms with an adjustment knob.

Phase Modulation Oscillator

The Phase Modulation oscillator allows you to alter the phase of two waveforms coinciding concurrently.  Because of its function, the PM oscillator starts each waveform at the exact same place each time a note is pressed.  This differs from the analogue oscillator which has each waveform in a “free-running” mode.

Frequency Modulation Oscillator

The Frequency modulation oscillator operates based on the principal of FM synthesis.  This concept involves modulating the frequency of a sine wave (carrier) with another sine wave (modulator).  By changing the amount knob (amount of modulator’s impact on the carrier) and by increase the pitch (via semitones) of both waves, you can get very metallic sounds, with rich harmonic content that can be used for anything from your typical dubstep basses to emulations of the Fender Rhodes pianos or even percussive bell sounds.

Wavetable Oscillator

The wavetable oscillator consists of many selections of prerecorded simple and complex waves allowing you to select different positions within the wave table or to modulate through several positions.

Noise Oscillator

The noise oscillator produces noise of different “colors”, broadband noise, different densities, and noise modified by a sample-and-hold function or rates.  Although noise is not always seen as a useful for musical applications, it can add depth to thin signals or even add  “snap” to synthesized percussion.  You can also set up keyboard tracking and a series of filters to “play” the noise bands.  Check out this tutorial on making an ambient pad soundscape with just noise and filters.


February 15, 2014

Notable Additions to Reason 7

Reason

In this post I would like to talk about my DAW of choice: REASON 7 by Propellerhead Software.  More specifically, what new features were added into version 7.  I currently use both Reason 7 and Pro Tools 10.  Even though I respect Pro Tools as an industry standard, and enjoy mixing/mastering with it, I prefer using Reason both as a "sketchpad" for laying down my song foundation, and also as a virtual rack ofhardwear in Pro Tools through its ReWire application.

Although version 7 hasn't implemented anything as drastic as v.6.5's incorporation of 3rd party plug-ins (called "Rack Extensions"), the new features that were included have no only made Reason 7 worth upgrading to, but also succeeded in solidifying its position as a competitor in the DAW market.

MIDI Out
For years, Reason users have been asking for MIDI out capabilities.  And for years, it never made any sense that this wasn't included in the software - especially since this DAW is MIDI oriented ("in the box").  But FINALLY its here!  

That last sentence may have felt a little over-the-top (and was so, on purpose) because I currently don't use this function... at all.  But I can see where having the ability to sequence an instrument part in the computer and have playback correspond on outboard gear is important.  this process is as simple as adding the new "MIDI" device to the virtual rack, write in your note sequence in a clip, and hit play.

Audio - to - Rex/Quantizing Audio
In my opinion, REX loops are the best way to take pre-recorded audio, chop it up, and rearrange it, or just import a loop and have it conform to tempo without any crazy time compression/expansion stretching of the audio.  Previously to version 7, you had to purchase an application called Recycle in order to convert audio into .REX formatting.  Well Recycle no more! ... but actually keep recycling because its good for the environment.

In version 7, audio clips (even the ones you record) can be quantized, chopped up, rearranged and tweaked easily within Reason.  You can even bounce these into the Dr. OctoRex (rex player) from the toolbox window without having to use another program. 

Audiomatic Retro Transformer
This little Rack Extension isn't reinventing the wheel or turning water into wine, but it is a neat (and FREE) effects unit that emulates what your audio would sound like if it were played back on different formats (such as tape, VHS, Vinyl, MP3, etc.) or a few snazzy effects settings (like "psychedelic" or "circuit") that alter your sound.  I have used the tape setting a few times.  It has a nice saturation and harmonic distortion emulation.

Factory Sound Bank
Propellerhead also updated the sample/loop and preset library that comes with the software with lots of high-quality recorded samples and interesting instrument/effects patches.

Bus Channels/Parallel Mix Channels
Reason 6's implementation of a mixer section - emulated after the SSL 9000k mixing console - elevated this DAW to a higher level.  But certain aspects were left out... like bus routing.  Through Reason's unique signal routing, it was possible to achieve bus routing and parallel processing, but the addition of this functionality within the mixer makes this possible much more quickly and easily in addition to the fact that you can process all of the signals with the SSL utilities.

EQ
The final addition to the software was the implementation of a graphic EQ with a spectrum analyzer within the spectral processing bank of the SSL.  This allows for a much more accurate representation of how adjustments to the mixer controls affect the sound.

All in all, I am overly satisfied with upgrading to Reason 7.  I highly reccomend downloading the trial version to take it out for a spin.  Check out Reason ExpertsLearn ReasonReason to Work and Reason 101 for tutorials and articles about things you can do with Reason.

U-He Zebra


This is just a quick look at U-He's Zebra plug-in and a few of the features I like/find interesting.  I really enjoy using this instrument in Pro Tools and I highly recommend it.  Check out these tutorials from ADSR for some cool ways to use Zebra.

February 08, 2014

Apple's new Trash receptacle Mac Pro design: What does the consumer really need to know?



As you can tell from my Happy Birthday Macintosh post, I am not Apple's biggest fan.  And I will openly admit that I mockingly poked fun at the new Mac Pro design.  I have referred to it as anything from "the trash can" to "Darth Vader's Roomba".  I freely pictured myself in a studio, reclining in my desk chair, throwing balled up pieces of paper into it from across the room as if it were a basketball hoop.

But all yokes aside, the 6-core version is a beast.  They probably should have bought the rights to the Punisher logo from Marvel and plastered it on the side of every model. So how "amazing" is the little guy?  Lets take a look at a comparison between my computer and the base model (targeted at the larger consumer demographic) of the new Mac Pro:

Component

My Computer

Mac Pro

Operating System 
Mountain Lion
Mavericks
CPU
 Intel i7-3770k
Quad Core
(3.5 GHz Base)
(3.9 GHz Turbo)
(4.2 GHz Over Clock)
Intel Xeon E5
Quad Core
(3.7 GHz Base)

(3.9 GHz Turbo)
Memory
2x 8 GB
1333 MHz
(Coarsair Vengeance) 
3x 4GB
1866 MHz 
Storage
2x 120 GB SSD
1 TB SATA Drive
256 GB 
Pcie flash storage
Graphics
Nvidia GTX 770
Clock: 1137-1189 MHz
# of Cuda Cores: 1536 
256-bit Memory Bus
Memory: 4GB VRAM (@7010 MHz)

Up to 3 displays via: 
(HDMI/Display Port/DVI-I/DVI-D)
2x AMD FirePro D300
Clock: *
Cuda Cores: Unavailable
256-bit Memory Bus
Memory: 2GB VRAM

Up to 3 4K Displays
Up to 6 Thunderbolt Displays
Connections
1x PS/2 (keyboard/Mouse)
6x USB 3.0 (rear) 1x USB 3.0 (Front)
4x USB 2.0 (Front)
1x Firewire 400 (Front)
2x eSata ports
1x S/PDIF optical port
2x Ethernet Ports
Plus aforementioned display ports
4x Usb 3.0
6x Thunderbolt
2x Ethernet Ports
1x HDMI
NetworkEthernet capability (no WiFi card)
Bluetooth 4.0
802.11 ac WiFi Networking
Bluetooth 4.0
Price
~$1400.00
$2999.00

*AMD has specially designed the FirePro D300's for the Mac Pro and I was unable to find a definitive clock speed.


So as we can see, in some cases my computer holds the advantage over the new Mac Pro design such as a faster processor (due to overclocking), more RAM (capable of being overclocked to match), a substantially greater amount of connections in addition to PCI expansion slots on the motherboard (which, given its design and size, I can only assume the Mac Pro does not have) and a much lower price.

In the Roomba's Mac Pro's defense, it has quality built-in networking capabilities, a ridiculous amount of Thunderbolt ports, and AMD's dual FirePro GPUs (although less powerful than the GTX 770, are still very impressive) and a larger Storage device.

But lets look at it from the view of the consumer: 

-$3000 is a lot of money.  And as I hinted at in my previous post, for half of that, I can build a comparable computer with a little bit more of a hassle (building/installation) than paying shipping cost.

-How upgradable is this system? In a year or two, when Intel comes out with faster processors, or AMD improves their GPU's, how easily can I upgrade my components (if at all possible)?

-Why do I need 6 Thunderbolt ports? Who has six devices (even displays) that need that speed?  Also... who has six devices that USE thunderbolt connectivity (More money for converter cords)

So for the average consumer, I have to say that the new Mac Pro isn't worth it.  Its not cost-efficient when it comes to performance.  Its a little over-kill for web browsing, games (at least for Mac games), and word processing.  Plus, even consumers like recording/post-production studios or graphic designers that would require a higher performance computer wouldn't buy the base model.  They would most-likely purchase the 6-Core model (base price at $3999.00).

All in all, I have to say that I am not "blown away" by the basic model.  The upgraded version is more of "WOW" but for an extra thousand dollars, I'd rather buy beer, food, school books, shoes, music... more beer... you get the point.  I will give Apple credit for stepping outside its comfort zone and contracting components to 3rd party manufacturers (Intel/AMD) and (try not to faint) for thinking of consumer needs when upgrading the system performance.  

Now if we could only teach Apple the concept of the "Bear Market" they might realize that their shareholders are still back in that "recession thing" and knock that price tag down a bit... Oh, wishful thinking... you slay me.

Sound on Sound Awards - 2014



So I recently came across the final listing of the Sound on Sound Award winners that were announced at this year's NAMM show.  If you haven't read my previous post about this years NAMM show, check it out!

The Sound on Sound awards are a series of prestigious honors bestowed on the best audio gear.  The winners are selected by the editorial staff of Sound on Sound Magazine and their readers.  What had started as a small idea in 2011 has bloomed into a respectable title that manufacturers, designers and engineers alike aspire to win.  The SOS Hall of Fame lists products like Avid's Pro Tools and the SSL Duality so you can understand the legitimacy and weight of winning this award.

This Year's Winners:


CategoryWinner
 Best Computer Audio InterfaceUniversal Audio Apollo 16
Best DAW SoftwareAppleLogic X
Best Effects & Processing HardwareUniversal Audio 1176
Best Software Plug-In (Effects)SoundToys Native Effects
Best Software Plug-In (Processing)iZotope RX2
Best Hardware ControllerApple iPad
Best Keyboard/SynthesizerYamaha Motif XF
Best MicrophoneAKG C414 XLS
Best Audio MixerRupert Neve Designs 5088
Best Studio MonitorsAdam F7
Best Hardware Audio RecorderZoom H6
Best Microphone PreampAMS Neve 1073
Best Software InstrumentSpectrasonics Omnisphere
Best Sound LibraryEastWest Symphonic Orchestra
Best Studio HeadphonesBeyerdynamic DT880
Best Live Sound ProductBehringer X32
Sound On Sound Editor's ChoiceSonyCreative Software SpectraLayers Pro 2

Now I could type and type about every single product on this list.  Some I am not super familiar with but I will discuss the ones I know more about.


Universal Audio

Apollo 16
1176









Universal Audio accepted two SOS awards this year: Best Audio Interface (Apollo 16) and Best Hardware processor (1176 Compressor).  Universal Audio is synonymous with quality and excellence.  I have not gotten the chance to work with either of these two pieces of hardware for an extended period of time however, from what I have experienced, "Top of the Line" just doesn't do them justice.

The Apollo 16 is a rack-mountable audio interface with 16x16 I/O.  It bolsters built in UAD-2 Quad DSP/FX hardware, a 24-bit/192kHz A/D converter and FireWire/Thunderbolt connectivity.  On the rear of the unit you will find 2 AES/EBU I/O's. 2 DB25 I/O's  and dedicated monitor outputs.

UA's award-winning 1176 FET compressor/limiter has proven to be a timeless piece of studio equipment, with a historic background since its inception in 1968.  The 1176LN is a FET compressor with input and output trim knobs, a multi-selection peak meter and variable ratio (4/8/12/20)that includes the "all-in" stage. 


iZotope RX2

**DISCLAIMER: I'm gonna have another iZotope fanboy moment**

iZotope's RX2 is a revolutionary spectral processing plug-in used to "heal" audio files by cleaning out recorded noise, electrical interference, digital distortion and other disruptive sounds.  Users can perform these tasks through tools that alter and display changes in real time on a spectrogram display.
I suggest checking out this overview video from iZotope to better understand the full extent of this awesome software plug-in:



AKG C414 XLS


The C414 is a studio workhorse that works well on vocals, instruments (mono and stereo pairs), overheads for drums or ambient mics... pretty much everything you could possibly record.  The XLS has an astonishing dynamic range of 152 dB with an S/N ratio of 88 dB, a frequency range spanning the entire human spectrum, a sensitivity rating of 20mV/Pa.  The microphone has LED lighting that signals thw 0dB/-6dB/-12dB/-18dB attenuation pads as well as the 12dB shelf at 40Hz/80Hz and the 6dB shelf at 160 Hz.

The C414 XLS also has multiple selectable polar patterns:



February 01, 2014

ART ProChannel II



Happy Birthday Macintosh!


This past week, the Macintosh computer turned 30 years old.  And over the course of that time, Mackintosh has gone from playing a dinky, hand-me-down 2nd fiddle, to a symphony orchestra.  So in honor of that achievement, I have decided to post about something that is near and dear to my technical heart:

HACKINTOSHES

Now I know what you're thinking... and yes, I can spell.  I did say "Hackintoshes".

Before I begin [*DISCLAIMER*]: Building a Hackintosh is a hobby, but it is a long winded process, full of research, preparation, headaches, frustration, sleepless nights and can drain your bank account quite a bit.  In addition, it is technically a violation of the OsX user agreement.  You know, the long thing nobody reads with the "agree"/"disagree" buttons at the end? Yea, that thing. I also need to say that this post is for educational purposes only and not for any profit -- monetary or otherwise. 

Now, I have been a Mac AND Windows user for most of my life.  My family got our first PC back when Gateway made computers and Windows 95 was brand new.  That thing ROCKED.  In terms of what computers today can offer, it was a piece of **** but I loved it nonetheless.  I also had this boxy gray computer with a picture of a half-eaten apple on it that occasionally played "games". And by "games" I mean these applications that told you a story (via text) and you had to type your actions in and 90% of the time you either died or got locked in a room with no foreseeable way out.

Anyway, In 2008 my high school received a technology grant from the state and decided to buy a bunch of Macbook laptops.  And like that big book with the people in the garden and the snake, I was tempted by the forbidden fruit and decided to switch to Apple.

Why did I switch? Yea it had cool applications. Yea, at the time Garageband was "pretty sweet".  But one thing stuck out in my mind: the user interface.  Using the Mac operating system was simple, intuitive and fun compared to Windows 95/97/XP. So I was happy. Keyword: "was".

In 2009 my Macbook caught fire. No... that is not an exaggeration.  The heat-sinks malfunctioned and smoke literally began spewing out of it. I replaced it (thank god for warranties) but it soon began to fail again.  In late 2011, I upgraded to a shiny new Macbook pro (this was around the time they stopped making regular Macbooks) and a little over two years later its still chuggin' along.

The question I began asking myself is: Was it worth it to switch to Mac? In six years I have owned three Mac laptops, spent dozens of hours at the Apple store with the "geniuses" and countless more doing face-palms due to the limitations of the hardware included in that sleek and sexy-looking aluminum box.  So with all of the headaches and struggle and trying desperately not to throw it out the window, I asked myself, "why am I still using Mac"?  The answer is simple: Mac OS is just too good to give up on.

Thats when I found out about Tonymacx86.com and this new concept called "Hackintoshes".  I read a bunch of articles and watched a couple of hours worth of youtube videos and was hooked.

(Reenactment of an inner-dialogue)
"You mean I can have the Mac operating system but not have to deal with Apple's limited hardware selection?"
"Yes"
"And I can pick and choose what goes into my own computer? I don't have to sacrifice quality for price?"
"Yea"
"And I can upgrade parts when the technology become obsolete?"
"Absolutely"
"And I can build a Mac Pro equivalent for a fraction of the price?"
"Yyyyyyuuuuupppp!"

So I was sold.  I took about two months doing research through articles and forums on TonyMacx86.com, watched youtube videos on how to assemble computer parts, and scraped together as much cash as I could find.  I bought all of the components and spent about four hours putting it all together. So finally I was finished.  I can breath a sigh of relief right?

Wrong.

I then spent close to two months finagling software modifications, motherboard Bios settings and hours of guess-and-check work.  Finally, one day it started working.  And it hasn't stopped or had the slightest inkling of a hiccup since. So again, I asked myself: "was it worth it?"

This time my answer is "absolutely". It was a struggle, and on multiple occasions I thought that maybe this was going to be a complete failure, but through persistence and with the help of the folks at TonyMacx86.com, I finally succeeded.  And to be honest, I haven't looked back.



From a performance standpoint, my custom MacPro can run a multi-track Pro Tools 10 session, with Reason 7 Rewired into it, multiple effects processors, reverbs and cpu-intensive plug-ins with full playback and zero errors or potato-moments from Pro Tools.  I am completely satisfied with my decision.

I highly recommend trying this out if you have the time, patience and willpower to do it.  You will need some computer "know-how" but most of the things you will need to know, you can learn from TonyMacx86.com. Without them, I would not have known about this, nor would I have succeeded in completing this project. To be honest, if you have the money to buy a Mac Pro, by all means buy it. The new R2D2/trashcan tower looks pretty cool and the specifications imply that it will perform really well.  Hackintoshes are for hobbyists, people who like to tinker with electronics and those of us who can't afford the (in my opinion) overpriced brand-name merch.